We call “named patch” what users would directly call “patch” in darcs. A named patch is what we create when we run
record in a repository. The history of a repository is made of named patches.
A named patch is a collection of primitive patches, recorded together with the following attributes:
a single line of text
the timestamp taken at record-time
an arbitrary text, usually in the format “
John De Bar <email@example.com>”
a longer description of the patch, possibly multiline. When parsing a patch, the first space character is removed from each line of the log. When computing a patch’s hash, trailing newlines are removed from each log line before concatenating.
- patch salt
the hexadecimal representation of some random number from 0 to 2^128. It’s random noise inserted into the log to help patch hashes stay unique. (see issue27, and the function
Darcs.Patch.Info.addJunk). This is actually stored inside the log, but not shown in most of the user interface (you may see it preceded by
All these attributes are specified or determined when the patch is recorded or amended and are meant to be read-only after then.
There is one other attribute on which the user has no impact:
- a boolean flag, that indicates if the patch is a result of a rollback (NB. obsolete since DarcsTwo uses a different way of doing rollbacks, but the flag is still there for backward compatibility). The inverted state is indicated by a ‘*’ or ’-’ character immediately preceding the patch’s date.
The unique hash id of any patch is computed by the following Haskell code in
makePatchname :: PatchInfo -> SHA1 makePatchname pi = sha1PS sha1_me where b2ps True = BC.pack "t" b2ps False = BC.pack "f" sha1_me = B.concat [_piName pi, _piAuthor pi, _piDate pi, B.concat $ _piLog pi, b2ps $ isInverted pi]
In other words, the hash is the SHA1 code of the tuple (name, author, date, log, inverted).
As you can notice, the hunks (that is the PrimitivePatch collection, the actual changes the NamedPatch is carrying) aren’t included in the formula. This is a strong assumption in darcs: there cannot be different patches with the exact same set of attributes, and in turn with the same hash.
Named patches are stored in the meta directory
A HashedFormat repository stores its patches in filenames composed by two parts:
- a ten digits zero-padded number, the uncompressed size of the whole patch
- the SHA256 64-digits signature of the whole patch
This has several benefits:
- darcs is able to assert that the mean of a patch wasn’t mangled in any way, because the filename is basically a checksum of the whole patch, hunks included
- it allows a better way of sharing patches between repositories, see CacheSystem
Since, as darcs commutes the patch with the others in the repository, the patch itself (its hunks, I mean) may change at any time:
- there’s no one-to-one relation between a particular hash name and the name of the file containing the patch
- there can be multiple instances of the same patch, collected under the
_darcs/patchesmetadir: of course, at any given time, at most one of them are effectively listed in the RepositoryInventory
Note also that even if the patch is compressed on disk, its filename does not end with